4.4 Article

Resource allocation for multiuser cognitive OFDM networks with proportional rate constraints

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 254-269

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dac.1272

Keywords

Cognitive radio; OFDM; proportional fairness; resource allocation

Funding

  1. Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [BK2008261]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60903179]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we study the resource allocation problem for the multiuser orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)-based cognitive radio (CR) systems with proportional rate constraints. The mutual interference introduced by primary user (PU) and cognitive radio user (also referred to secondary user, SU) makes the optimization problem of CR systems more complex. Moreover, the interference introduced to PUs must be kept under a given threshold. In this paper, the highest achievable rate of each OFDM subchannel is calculated by jointly considering the channel gain and interference level. First, a subchannel is assigned to the SU with the highest achievable rate. The remaining subchannels are always allocated to the SU that suffers the severest unjustness. Second, an efficient bit allocation algorithm is developed to maximize the sum capacity, which is again based on the highest achievable rate of each subchannel. Finally, an adjustment procedure is designed to maintain proportional fairness. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm maximizes the sum capacity while keeping the proportional rate constraints satisfied. The algorithm exhibits a good tradeoff between sum capacity maximization and proportional fairness. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm has lower complexity compared with other algorithms, rendering it promising for practical applications. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available