4.5 Article

Incidence, risks and outcome of radiological leak following early contrast enema after anterior resection

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 453-458

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1820-8

Keywords

Anterior resection; Colorectal cancer; Anastomotic leak; Radiological leak

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Anastomotic leak (AL) is a major complication following anterior resection for colorectal cancer. Early contrast enema may diagnose subclinical anastomotic leakage. Knowledge of factors concerning AL is vital to its detection. The aim of this study was to define the incidence, risks and outcome of radiological leak following routine early contrast enema after anterior resection. Methods A cohort of 129 patients who underwent anterior resection for colorectal cancer and had an early Gastrografin enema between July 2008 and December 2012 in a tertiary referral centre was identified from a prospective database. The severity of AL was defined using the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC) grading system. Results Of the 129 patients, 65.1 % were male, and the mean age at surgery was 64.6 +/- 1.1 years. Gastrografin enema was performed on average on post-operative day 4.8 +/- 0.2. Eighteen patients (14.0 %) had a radiological leak on Gastrografin enema, and nine patients (7.0 %) had a clinical AL. On multivariate analysis, only being of male sex and having a loop ileostomy increased the risk of radiological AL. Gastrografin enema had a sensitivity of 100 % (95 % CI 66-100 %) and specificity of 93 % (95 % CI 86-97 %) for predicting clinical AL. Of the 18 patients with radiological leaks, 11 were ISREC grade A, 3 were grade B and 4 were grade C. Conclusions In the current series, early Gastrografin enema following anterior resection identifies a 14% radiological leak rate and has a high sensitivity and specificity for predicting clinical AL. The majority of radiological leaks may be managed conservatively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available