4.5 Review

Advances in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 1-10

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-2029-1

Keywords

MPM; CRS; HIPEC; Diagnosis; Management

Funding

  1. Wujieping Foundation [320.6750.12204]
  2. Young People Research Fund for the grant National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [81201828]
  3. Young People Foundation of Heilongjiang Provincial of China [QC2012C013]
  4. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [81101758]
  5. Health Department of Heilongjiang Provincial of China [2011-124]
  6. Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital major project Foundation [JJZ-2010-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Malignant mesothelioma is a rare, insidious, and aggressive tumor arising from the mesothelial surface of pleural and peritoneal cavities, the pericardium, or the tunica vaginalis, with an increasing incidence worldwide, high misdiagnosis rate, and overall negative prognosis. A total of 20 % of all cases is peritoneum in origin. Methods The present study is a review of literatures focusing on the advances in epidemiology, clinical presentations, radiological features, diagnosis, misdiagnosis, management, and prognostic factors of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) occurred in the past decades. Results Asbestos, SV40, and radiation exposures have been demonstrated to be correlated with the pathogenesis of MPM. The main presentations are abdominal distension and pain. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron-emission tomography (PET) play an important role in the preoperative imaging and staging. Definitive diagnosis is made on the basis of immunohistochemistry. Prognostic factors have been identified and verified. Negative indicators include advanced age, male gender, poor performance status, non-epithelial histology, and absence of surgery. The management of MPM has evolved from single chemotherapy to multimodality treatment of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Promising results have been achieved after a combined treatment of CRS and HIPEC, with an elevated median survival time of 29.5-92 months and a 5-year survival rate of 39-63 %. Conclusions CRS and HIPEC represent the standard treatment strategy for selected patients with MPM, and patients with unresectable tumors can benefit from the combined treatment of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available