4.7 Article

Reflectance parameters of cokes in relation to their reactivity index (CRI) and the strength after reaction (CSR), from coals of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 43-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2011.10.008

Keywords

Coke; Reflectance parameters; CRI; CSR; Microtexture

Funding

  1. State Committee for Scientific Research (KBN), Poland
  2. [5 T12A 043 22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coke samples made from coals and blends of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland were studied to determine relationships between their reflectance parameters (R-max, R-min, R-bi) and technological indices CRI and CSR. It was found that coke reactivity with CO2 decreased, and coke strength after reaction increased, with increasing mean maximum reflectance (R-max) and bireflectance (R-bi) and with decreasing mean minimum reflectance (R-min) of cokes. It was also observed that for cokes with bireflectance below 4.0%. CRI indices are higher than the CSR, but when coke bireflectances rises above 4.0% then their CSRs surpassed the CRI values. Thus, R-bi congruent to 4.0% seems to correspond with structural transformation of cokes resulting in the increase of their mechanical strength and adequate decrease of reactivity with CO2 and, as a consequence, improving coke quality. Relationships of the CRI and CSR indices with cokes reflectance parameters turned out to be similar but distinctly stronger than those with cokes microtextures. The results obtained showed additionally, that higher inertinite content in parent coals (>= 30 vol.%) could make poorer resultant cokes, i.e. increase of the CRI and decrease of the CSR factors. This influence varies depending on the rank of initial coals and is greater for middle rank coals than those from lower ranks. The results show that reflectance parameters of coke, especially bireflectance, make possible the prediction of CRI and CSR indices, and thus can be used for estimation of coke quality. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available