4.7 Article

Micro-Raman spectroscopy of carbonized semifusinite and fusinite

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY
Volume 87, Issue 3-4, Pages 253-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2011.06.016

Keywords

Coal; Inertinite; Semifusinite; Fusinite; Raman spectroscopy; Heating experiment

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland [3631/B/T02/2008/35]
  2. Silesian University of Technology [BW-475/RG-0/2008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of the study was to present application of micro-Raman spectroscopy for examination of coal macerals and to characterize the internal structure of semifusinite and fusinite heated at 400-1200 degrees C, in an argon atmosphere. Examination was performed on inertinite concentrates prepared from three samples of steam and coking bituminous coals (R-r = 0.98-1.42%) from the Upper Silesian Coal Basin of Poland. Fusinite and semifusinite, as well as reactive and non-reactive forms of the latter maceral differ in terms of structural properties, as inferred from the Raman-derived parameters. Behavior of both macerals under heat-treatment is determined by their structural and chemical properties. Carbonization causes rebuilding of macromolecular network of semifusinite and fusinite resulting in the growth of polyaromatic units and, in case of the former maceral, also increases in structural organization. This is followed by significant reflectance increase. Semifusinite carbonized at 1200 degrees C has larger coherent domains and they are more ordered than in fusinite, which results in higher reflectance value. The A(D3) (+) (D4)/A(ALL) ratio may be used as a measure of inertinite reactivity. Significant relationships between random reflectance (R-r) of semifusinite and fusinite and the I-DI/I-G ratio and position of most Raman bands (G, D1, D2 and D3) for the studied temperature range were found. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available