4.1 Article

Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in neonates admitted to the neonatology unit at the Jordan University Hospital

Publisher

DUSTRI-VERLAG DR KARL FEISTLE
DOI: 10.5414/CP201456

Keywords

vancomycin; neonates; TDM

Funding

  1. University of Jordan [16/2006-2007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Vancomycin is used in neonatal intensive care units to treat nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or coagulase-negative staphylococci. Current dosing regimens are not adequate, producing trough concentrations below the target range. Patients and methods: 151 neonates who received vancomycin and had vancomycin peak and trough concentration measurements as part of regular therapeutic drug monitoring were utilized. The patients were divided into three groups according to gestational age; less than 28 weeks, 28 to less than 34 weeks and 34 weeks to term. Neonates were given vancomycin doses as per guidelines. The pharmacokinetic parameters, elimination rate constant (K), elimination half-life (t(1/2)), volume of distribution (VD) and clearance (CL), were calculated. Results: Peak vancomycin concentrations ranged from 9.4 to 52.8 mg/l, while troughs ranged from 0.0 to 16.6 mg/l. One third of the trough concentrations were below 5 mg/l and are thus, subtherapeutic. There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups in regard to elimination rate constant and half-life. However, there was a statistically significant difference in volume of distribution between the three groups (p < 0.05), and in clearance between the first group and the other two (p < 0.05), using Kruskal-Wallis statistical test. Conclusions: The empirical dosing method used was inadequate in one third of patients. Individualization of vancomycin dosing in the neonatal critical care unit at The Jordan University Hospital seems necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available