4.6 Article

Climate change effects on crop yields in Serbia and related shifts of Koppen climate zones under the SRES-A1B and SRES-A2

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages 3320-3334

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/joc.4209

Keywords

shifts of Koppen climate zones; Serbia; model complexity; crop yield change; climate indices; climate change; A1B scenario; A2 scenario

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia [III 43007]
  2. Provincial Secretariat for Science and Technological Development of Vojvodina [114-451-2151/2011-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We considered shifts in the Koppen climate zones and the corresponding impact on the crop yields in Serbia by comparing (1) the results of downscaling with the ECMWF Hamburg Atmospheric Model 5 (ECHAM5) and regional Eta Belgrade University (EBU)-Princeton Ocean Model (POM) model for the A1B and A2 scenarios over 2001-2030 and 2071-2100 and (2) the present climate simulations for the period 1961-1990. We analyzed the EBU-POM regional climate model complexity by calculating the corresponding metrics. The yields of winter wheat, maize and soybeans were evaluated with the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) model. In the future, the Koppen climate zones of Serbia will shift in coverage percentage and altitude from the present climate simulations toward warmer and drier climate zones. The calculated climate indices feature changes in the following parameters: increases in the mean annual temperature, growing season temperature, number of growing degree days (higher than 5 degrees C) and the frequency of tropical days; and decreases in the mean annual precipitation, growing season precipitation and frequency of frost days. Yields of crops (winter wheat, maize and soybeans) will increase on average under both scenarios, with the exception of maize in non-irrigated conditions and under the A2 scenario.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available