4.6 Article

Assessment of the effects of acid-coated ice nuclei on the Arctic cloud microstructure, atmospheric dehydration, radiation and temperature during winter

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 599-614

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/joc.3454

Keywords

Arctic climate; arctic haze; aerosols; clouds; ice nuclei; aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions

Funding

  1. Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Fonds Quebecois de la Recherche sur la Nature et la Technologie (FQRNT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Owing to the large-scale transport of pollution-derived aerosols from the mid-latitudes to the Arctic, most of the aerosols are coated with acidic sulfate during winter in the Arctic. Recent laboratory experiments have shown that acid coating on dust particles substantially reduces the ability of these particles to nucleate ice crystals. Simulations performed using the Limited Area version of the Global Multiscale Environmental Model (GEM-LAM) are used to assess the potential effect of acid-coated ice nuclei on the Arctic cloud and radiation processes during January and February 2007. Ice nucleation is treated using a new parameterization based on laboratory experiments of ice nucleation on sulphuric acid-coated and uncoated kaolinite particles. Results show that acid coating on dust particles has an important effect on cloud microstructure, atmospheric dehydration, radiation and temperature over the Central Arctic, which is the coldest part of the Arctic. Mid and upper ice clouds are optically thinner while low-level mixed-phase clouds are more frequent and persistent. These changes in the cloud microstructures affect the radiation at the top of the atmosphere with longwave negative cloud forcing values ranging between 0 and 6 W m2 over the region covered by the Arctic air mass. Copyright (c) 2012 Royal Meteorological Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available