4.6 Article

Comparison of global gridded precipitation products over a mountainous region of Africa

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 1627-1638

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/joc.1669

Keywords

climatology; Ethiopia; interpolation; precipitation; raingauge; validation

Funding

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NA050AR4311004]
  2. U.S. Geological Survey [06CRAG0028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Five gridded monthly precipitation products are evaluated using a gauge network over complex topography in Africa. The global gridded products considered are produced by the Global Precipitation Climatology Center (GPCC), NOAA Climate Prediction Center (NOAA-CPC), and the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (UEA-CRU). Three different products from GPCC are available at multiple spatial resolutions: 0.5, 1 and 2.5 degrees; the NOAA-CPC product has a spatial resolution of 2.5 degrees while that of UEA-CRU is 0.5 degrees. Comparisons of the GPCC and UEA-CRU products are carried out at spatial resolutions of 0.5, 1 and 2.5 degrees, while NOAA-CPC is compared with the other products only at 2.5 degrees resolution. There is very strong agreement between the gridded global products and the reference raingauge data. Average correlation coefficients are about 0.95, 0.92, and 0.90 at 2.5, 1.0 and 0.5 degrees spatial resolutions, respectively. Both systematic and random errors are reasonably low. The performance of these products is highest during the wettest season (Jun-Aug), and relatively poor during the dry season (Dec-Feb). The seasonal differences are more prominent at high resolution. These results are very encouraging, particularly, when considering the complex terrain of the validation site. Copyright (C) 2008 Royal Meteorological Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available