4.3 Article

Prevalence of thoracic aortic calcification and its relationship to cardiovascular risk factors and coronary calcification in an unselected population-based cohort: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 207-216

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0051-3

Keywords

Thoracic aortic calcification; Coronary artery calcium; Computed tomography

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF)
  2. German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR)), Bonn, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thoracic aortic calcification (TAC) and coronary artery calcium (CAC) have been proposed for risk assessment of coronary artery and cardiovascular disease events. The aim of this analysis is to assess the prevalence of TAC and to determine its relationship with cardiovascular risk factors and CAC in a general unselected population. TAC was measured from electron beam computed tomography scans and quantified by Agatston-Score in 4,025 participants aged 45-75 years (mean age 59.4 +/- A 7.8 years, 53 % female) from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. Multivariable generalized linear regression was used to evaluate relationships between TAC and cardiovascular risk factors and CAC. Overall 2,538/4,025 (63.1 %) participants revealed TAC. Prevalence of TAC was greater in men than in women (65.2 vs. 61.7 %, p = 0.009). TAC was most strongly associated with age, systolic blood pressure, smoking and high levels of LDL-cholesterol. Prevalence of CAC was significantly higher in participants with TAC than without (74.0 vs. 57.6 %, p < 0.0001) demonstrating an increased risk of having CAC in the presence of TAC (prevalence ratio (PR) 1.29 [95 % CI: 1.22-1.35], p < 0.0001, PR adjusted for risk factors 1.14 [1.09-1.20], p < 0.0001). In general population, TAC has high prevalence and largely shares cardiovascular risk factors with CAD while being independently associated with present CAC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available