4.6 Article

Comparison of heart-type fatty acid binding protein and sensitive troponin for the diagnosis of early acute myocardial infarction

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 166, Issue 2, Pages 347-351

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.080

Keywords

Acute myocardial infarction; Acute coronary syndrome; Biomarker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The current development of serological biomarkers allows detection of smaller myocardial necrosis and early acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated the relevance of the heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) assay, which has recently been approved in Japan, for early diagnosis of AMI as compared with the sensitive troponin assay. Methods: This is an observational study in a single center. From 2010 July to 2011 January, 114 patients who presented with symptoms suggestive of AMI were enrolled. Results: AMI was adjudicated in 45 patients (40%). The diagnostic accuracy of measurements obtained at presentation for AMI, as quantified by the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), was significantly lower with H-FABP assay than the sensitive troponin assay [AUC for H-FABP, 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.70; and for troponin I, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94; P < .0001]. Among patients who presented within 2 h after the onset of chest pain, the AUC for H-FABP was even low as compared with sensitive troponin (0.55; 0.39-0.72 vs. 0.89; 0.80-0.98, p < 0.001). The clinical sensitivity for the diagnosis of AMI with the cutoff point of 99th percentile was similar in both assays (81% and 81%, respectively), however, the specificity was extremely low in the H-FABP assay as compared with sensitive troponin assay (19% and 79%, respectively). Conclusion: The measurement of H-FABP in 114 consecutive patients with chest pain suggestive of AMI showed no improvement of diagnosis for early AMI as compared with the current sensitive troponin assay because of its extremely low specificity. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available