4.6 Article

Treatment and outcome in acute myocardial infarction in a community in relation to gender

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages 315-322

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.065

Keywords

Acute myocardial infarction; Gender; Prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To describe treatment and outcome in all patients in a community with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in relation to gender. Methods: All patients discharged from hospital between 2001 and 2002 in Goteborg, Sweden, with a diagnosis of AMI underwent a survey to find possible gender differences. All p-values are age adjusted. Results: Among 1423 admissions, women comprised 41% and were older than men (mean 79 versus mean 72 years). Women were admitted to a coronary care unit less frequently than men (49% versus 67%; p = 0.005). Women underwent coronary angiography less frequently (21% versus 40%; p = 0.02). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 10% of the women and 18% of the men (p = 0.36). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed in 2% of the women and in 9% of the men (p < 0.0001). Female gender was associated with a lower risk of reinfarction during first year after hospital discharge (12% versus 16%; p = 0.003). The cumulative three-year mortality was 49% in women and 41% in men. However, when adjusting for age, admittance to CCU, coronary angiography and coronary revascularisation, risk of death during 3 years was lower in women than men (odds ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.85; p = 0.0001). Conclusion: In the community of Goteborg women (mean age 79 years) with AMI are prioritised differently than men (mean age 72 years), prior to admission to a CCU. This results in a less invasive strategy in women, particularly with regard to CABG. When adjusting for difference in age, admittance to CCU and coronary revascularisation female gender was associated with a low risk of death during the subsequent 3 years. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available