4.6 Article

Low adiponectin levels predict late in-stent restenosis after bare metal stenting in native coronary arteries

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages 78-82

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.09.004

Keywords

Adiponectin; Restenosis; Stents; Coronary disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Adiponectin, the most abundant protein secreted from adipose tissue, possesses anti-atherogenic properties. This study tested whether adiponectin plasma levels predict in-stent restenosis (ISR) after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare-metal stents. Methods: The study included 148 consecutive patients who had elective PCI with bare-metal stents in de novo lesions of native coronary arteries for symptomatic coronary artery disease. Adiponectin levels were measured by ELISA 3 days or less before PCI. Results: Angiographic ISR (defined as >50% diameter stenosis) was found in 49 (33%) patients during 6 months of the follow-up. Adiponectin levels were lower in patients with ISR than those without ISR (3.5 +/- 0.3 vs. 6.9 +/- 0.4 mu g/ml, respectively, p<0.01). Adiponectin levels were inversely correlated with late luminal loss of the stented lesions (r=-0.40, p<0.01). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, low adiponectin levels (<4.5 mu g/ml, arbitrarily determined from a receiver operating characteristic curve) served as a predictor of ISR that was independent of angiographic and procedural variables, and clinical factors known to be associated with ISR (odds ratio, 7.9; 95% CI, 3.0-21; p<0.01). Furthermore, low adiponectin levels also independently predicted target lesion revascularization (n=35) during follow-up (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.4-9.7; p<0.01). Conclusions: Low adiponectin levels have a predictive value for late ISR after PCI with bare-metal stents in native coronary arteries. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available