4.7 Article

FcγR interaction is not required for effective anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy but can add additional benefit depending on the tumor model

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 144, Issue 2, Pages 345-354

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31899

Keywords

Fc gamma R; anti-PD-L1 mAb therapy; tumor microenvironment

Categories

Funding

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [2014-6828]
  2. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme [MCA-ITN 317445 TIMCC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunomodulatory antibodies blocking interactions of coinhibitory receptors to their ligands such as CTLA-4, PD1 and PD-L1 on immune cells have shown impressive therapeutic efficacy in clinical studies. The therapeutic effect of these antibodies is mainly mediated by reactivating antitumor T cell immune responses. Detailed analysis of anti-CTLA4 antibody therapy revealed that an optimal therapeutic efficacy also requires binding to Fc receptors for IgG, Fc gamma R, mediating depletion of intratumoral regulatory T cells. Here, we investigated the role of Fc binding in anti-PD-L1 antibody therapy in the MC38 C57BL/6 and CT26 BALB/c colon adenocarcinoma tumor models. In the MC38 tumor model, all IgG subclasses anti-PD-L1 showed similar therapeutic efficacy when compared to each other in either wild-type mice or in mice deficient for all Fc gamma R. In contrast, in the CT26 tumor model, anti-PD-L1 mIgG2a, the IgG subclass with the highest affinity for activating Fc gamma R, showed stronger therapeutic efficacy than other IgG subclasses. This was associated with a reduction of a myeloid cell subset with high expression of PD-L1 in the tumor microenvironment. This subclass preference for mIgG2a was lost in C57BL/6 x BALB/c F1 mice, indicating that the genetic background of the host may determine the additional clinical benefit of the high affinity antibody subclasses. Based on these data, we conclude that Fc gamma R are not crucial for anti-PD-L1 antibody therapy but might play a role in some tumor models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available