4.7 Article

Healthy lifestyle and risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 136, Issue 11, Pages 2640-2648

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29315

Keywords

breast cancer; healthy index; lifestyle; prospective studies; Europe

Categories

Funding

  1. Genesis Oncology Trust
  2. European Commission (DG-SANCO)
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer
  4. Danish Cancer Society (Denmark)
  5. Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) (France)
  6. Deutsche Krebshilfe
  7. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
  8. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
  9. Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece)
  10. Italian Association for Research on Cancer (AIRC)
  11. National Research Council (Italy)
  12. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS)
  13. Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR)
  14. LK Research Funds
  15. Dutch Prevention Funds
  16. Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland)
  17. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)
  18. Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands)
  19. Nordforsk
  20. Nordic Centre of Excellence programme on Food, Nutrition and Health. (Norway)
  21. Health Research Fund (FIS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health [ISCIII RETICC RD06/0020/0091]
  22. Catalan Institute of Oncology
  23. Swedish Cancer Society
  24. Swedish Scientific Council
  25. Regional Government of Skane and Vasterbotten (Sweden)
  26. Cancer Research UK
  27. Medical Research Council
  28. Stroke Association
  29. British Heart Foundation
  30. Department of Health, Food Standards Agency
  31. Welcome Trust (United Kingdom)
  32. [ERC-2009-AdG 232997]
  33. Cancer Research UK [16491] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and prevention strategies are needed to reduce incidence worldwide. A healthy lifestyle index score (HLIS) was generated to investigate the joint effect of modifiable lifestyle factors on postmenopausal breast cancer risk. The study included 242,918 postmenopausal women from the multinational European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, with detailed information on diet and lifestyle assessed at baseline. The HLIS was constructed from five factors (diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption and anthropometry) by assigning scores of 0-4 to categories of each component, for which higher values indicate healthier behaviours. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated by Cox proportional regression models. During 10.9 years of median follow-up, 7,756 incident breast cancer cases were identified. There was a 3% lower risk of breast cancer per point increase of the HLIS. Breast cancer risk was inversely associated with a high HLIS when fourth versus second (reference) categories were compared [adjusted HR=0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.83]. The fourth versus the second category of the HLIS was associated with a lower risk for hormone receptor double positive (adjusted HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.98) and hormone receptor double negative breast cancer (adjusted HR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.90). Findings suggest having a high score on an index of combined healthy behaviours reduces the risk of developing breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Programmes which engage women in long term health behaviours should be supported. What's new? How much does behavior really affect cancer risk? These authors set out to measure just that. First, they created a Healthy Lifestyle Index, which quantified five modifiable behaviors, such as smoking and physical activity. Then, using data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), they assigned each participant a score between 0 and 4 on each of the behaviors. It turned out that with each point added to a person's Healthy Lifestyle Index score, breast cancer risk fell by 3%, suggesting that public programs to help women maintain these behaviors could be worthwhile for cancer prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available