4.7 Article

Absence of cytomegalovirus in high-coverage DNA sequencing of human glioblastoma multiforme

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 136, Issue 4, Pages 977-981

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29042

Keywords

cytomegalovirus; glioblastoma multiforme; computational biology

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  2. Swedish Medical Research Council.
  3. Swedish Cancer Society
  4. Assar Gabrielsson Foundation
  5. Magnus Bergvall Foundation
  6. Ake Wiberg foundation
  7. Lars Hierta Memorial Foundation [b2012108.]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) has been proposed to be associated with glioblastoma multiforme, but there are conflicting results including lack of CMV mRNA in transcriptome sequencing data. Here, we utilized deep-coverage whole-genome sequencing data to detect latent CMV DNA in surgically resected tumors and to assess the relative proportions of viral and human DNA. We did not find traces of CMV in 52.6 billion DNA sequencing reads from 34 glioblastomas. By statistical analysis, we conclude that should the virus be present in these tumors, the average CMV level does not exceed one virus per 240,000 tumor cells (99% CI). What's new? While cytomegalovirus (CMV) has been functionally implicated in glioblastoma, its presence has been challenged by several reports, including lack of CMV mRNA in transcriptome studies. Here, the authors utilized deep-coverage whole-genome sequencing data to detect CMV DNA in surgically resected tumors. They found no traces of CMV in 52.6 billion DNA sequencing reads from 34 glioblastomas. Based on statistical analysis, they conclude that should the virus be present in these tumors, the average CMV level does not exceed one virus per 240,000 tumor cells (99% CI), effectively settling any remaining controversies regarding widespread presence of CMV DNA in glioblastoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available