4.7 Article

Coffee and tea consumption, genotype- based CYP1A2 and NAT2 activity and colorectal cancer risk- Results from the EPIC cohort study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages 401-412

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28655

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; coffee; tea; CYP1A2; NAT2

Categories

Funding

  1. European Commission
  2. Ligue contre le Cancer, Societe 3M, Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) (France)
  3. German Cancer Aid, German Cancer Research Center, Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
  4. Danish Cancer Society (Denmark)
  5. Health Research Fund (FIS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health, the participating regional governments and institutions (Spain)
  6. Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council, Stroke Association, British Heart Foundation, Department of Health, Food Standards Agency, the Wellcome Trust (United Kingdom)
  7. Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece)
  8. Italian Association for Research on Cancer, National Research Council (Italy)
  9. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR), LK Research Funds, Dutch Prevention Funds, Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland), World Cancer Research Fund (The Netherlands), Statistics Netherlands
  10. Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Scientific Council, Regional Government of Skane (Sweden)
  11. Norwegian Research Council and NordForsk (Norway)
  12. Cancer Research UK [16491, 14136] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Medical Research Council [G1002084, G1000143, G0401527] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10114] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. MRC [G1002084] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coffee and tea contain numerous antimutagenic and antioxidant components and high levels of caffeine that may protect against colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the association between coffee and tea consumption and CRC risk and studied potential effect modification by CYP1A2 and NAT2 genotypes, enzymes involved in the metabolization of caffeine. Data from 477,071 participants (70.2% female) of the European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort study were analyzed. At baseline (1992-2000) habitual (total, caffeinated and decaffeinated) coffee and tea consumption was assessed with dietary questionnaires. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratio's (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Potential effect modification by genotype-based CYP1A2 and NAT2 activity was studied in a nested case-control set of 1,252 cases and 2,175 controls. After a median follow-up of 11.6 years, 4,234 participants developed CRC (mean age 64.78.3 years). Total coffee consumption (high vs. non/low) was not associated with CRC risk (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95-1.18) or subsite cancers, and no significant associations were found for caffeinated (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.97-1.26) and decaffeinated coffee (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84-1.11) and tea (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.09). High coffee and tea consuming subjects with slow CYP1A2 or NAT2 activity had a similar CRC risk compared to non/low coffee and tea consuming subjects with a fast CYP1A2 or NAT2 activity, which suggests that caffeine metabolism does not affect the link between coffee and tea consumption and CRC risk. This study shows that coffee and tea consumption is not likely to be associated with overall CRC. What's new? Coffee and tea contain numerous compounds that may protect against colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study of more than 475,000 participants over more than a decade, the authors investigated whether coffee or tea consumption is associated with an altered risk of developing CRC. They also asked whether genetic variations in two enzymes involved in caffeine metabolism (CYP1A2 and NAT2) might affect this risk. They conclude that neither consumption patterns, nor genetic differences in caffeine metabolism, appear to have a significant impact on CRC risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available