4.7 Article

Circulating nucleosomes and immunogenic cell death markers HMGB1, sRAGE and DNAse in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 133, Issue 11, Pages 2619-2630

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28294

Keywords

nucleosomes; HMBG1; sRAGE; DNAse activity; pancreatic cancer; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Roche Diagnostics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serum biomarkers are urgently needed for patient stratification and efficient treatment monitoring in pancreatic cancer (PC). Within a prospective diagnostic observation study, blood samples were obtained from 78 patients with advanced PC before and weekly during the course of palliative chemotherapy. Circulating nucleosomes and immunogenic cell death markers, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), soluble receptors of advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and DNAse activity, were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and correlated with results of radiological staging after 2 months of treatment, with time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Median TTP and OS of PC patients were 3.9 and 7.7 months, respectively. Pretherapeutic baseline biomarker levels did not correlate with objective response; however, nucleosome levels on day (d) 28 were higher (p = 0.048) and sRAGE levels at time of staging (d56) were lower in progressive patients (p = 0.046). Concerning estimation of prognosis, high nucleosome levels (d7, d14, d21 and d56), low sRAGE levels (d56) and DNAse activity courses (d0-d7) correlated with TTP, whereas high nucleosomes (d7, d14 and d56), high HMGB1 (d21 and d56) and DNAse (d0-d7) were associated with OS. After adjustment to Karnofsky performance score, nucleosomes and HMGB1 (both d56) and DNAse (d0-d7) remained independent prognostic factors. Thus, courses of circulating nucleosomes and immunogenic cell death markers HMGB1 and sRAGE show prognostic relevance in PC patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available