4.7 Article

Serum fibrinogen is an independent prognostic factor in operable nonsmall cell lung cancer

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 133, Issue 11, Pages 2720-2725

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28284

Keywords

nonsmall cell lung cancer; operation; serum fibrinogen; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Public Health Science Research Foudation-Zhejiang Province Medical Science Major Technology [WKJ2009-2-018]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health talents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serum fibrinogen converted to insoluble fibrin by activated thrombin, plays an important role in the coagulation system. Increased fibrinogen considerably influences cancer cell growth, progression and metastasis. In nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, the association between serum fibrinogen concentration and prognosis has not been fully examined. We enlisted 567 operable NSCLC patients in our study. Preoperative serum fibrinogen was measured by the Clauss method. The association of serum fibrinogen concentration with clinical pathological factors and patient outcome was evaluated. Survival analysis indicated that serum fibrinogen was an independent prognostic factor in operable NSCLC. Patients with hyperfibrinogenemia had an elevated risk of disease progression and death compared to patients with normal fibrinogen levels. The hazard ratio was 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.05) for disease progression and 1.64 (95% CI 1.06-2.53) for death. The trend linking increasing fibrinogen levels with risk was also statistically significant for both outcomes (p < 0.05). These analyses were adjusted for patient age, sex, smoking behavior, disease stage, tumor grade and histology. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed similar results. Preoperative serum fibrinogen is a novel independent prognostic biomarker in operable NSCLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available