4.7 Article

Menstrual and reproductive factors in women, genetic variation in CYP17A1, and pancreatic cancer risk in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC) cohort

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 132, Issue 9, Pages 2164-2175

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27875

Keywords

pancreatic cancer; menstruation; reproduction; hormones; estrogens; women; CYP17A1

Categories

Funding

  1. Health Research Fund (FIS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health [Exp PI07/0130]
  2. Catalan Institute of Oncology, La Caixa [BM 06-130, RETICC-RD06/0020]
  3. European Commission (DG-SANCO)
  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer
  5. Regional Government of Andalucia
  6. Regional Government of Asturias
  7. Regional Government of Basque Country
  8. Regional Government of Murcia
  9. Regional Government of Navarra
  10. Danish Cancer Society (Denmark)
  11. Ligue contre le Cancer (France)
  12. Institut Gustave Roussy (France)
  13. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale (France)
  14. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) (France)
  15. Deutsche Krebshilfe (Germany)
  16. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (Germany)
  17. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
  18. Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity (Greece)
  19. Stavros Niarchos Foundation (Greece)
  20. Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece)
  21. Italian Association for Research on Cancer (AIRC) (Italy)
  22. National Research Council (Italy)
  23. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS) (The Netherlands)
  24. Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR) (The Netherlands)
  25. LK Research Funds (The Netherlands)
  26. Dutch Prevention Funds (The Netherlands)
  27. Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland) (The Netherlands)
  28. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) (The Netherlands)
  29. Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands)
  30. Norwegian Cancer Society (Norway)
  31. Swedish Cancer Society (Sweden)
  32. Swedish Scientific Council (Sweden)
  33. Regional Government of Skane and Vasterbotten (Sweden)
  34. Cancer Research UK (United Kingdom)
  35. Medical Research Council (United Kingdom)
  36. Stroke Association (United Kingdom)
  37. British Heart Foundation (United Kingdom)
  38. Department of Health (United Kingdom)
  39. Food Standards Agency (United Kingdom)
  40. Wellcome Trust (United Kingdom)
  41. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12015/1, G0401527, MC_U106179471, G1000143] Funding Source: researchfish
  42. MRC [MC_UU_12015/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Menstrual and reproductive factors and exogenous hormone use have been investigated as pancreatic cancer risk factors in case-control and cohort studies, but results have been inconsistent. We conducted a prospective examination of menstrual and reproductive factors, exogenous hormone use and pancreatic cancer risk (based on 304 cases) in 328,610 women from the EPIC cohort. Then, in a case-control study nested within the EPIC cohort, we examined 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CYP17A1 (an essential gene in sex steroid metabolism) for association with pancreatic cancer in women and men (324 cases and 353 controls). Of all factors analyzed, only younger age at menarche (<12 vs. 13 years) was moderately associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in the full cohort; however, this result was marginally significant (HR = 1.44; 95% CI = 0.992.10). CYP17A1 rs619824 was associated with HRT use (p value = 0.037) in control women; however, none of the SNPs alone, in combination, or as haplotypes were associated with pancreatic cancer risk. In conclusion, with the possible exception of an early age of menarche, none of the menstrual and reproductive factors, and none of the 12 common genetic variants we evaluated at the CYP17A1 locus makes a substantial contribution to pancreatic cancer susceptibility in the EPIC cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available