4.7 Article

High prevalence and breast cancer predisposing role of the BLM c.1642 C>T (Q548X) mutation in Russia

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 130, Issue 12, Pages 2867-2873

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26342

Keywords

BLM; Bloom syndrome; breast cancer; BRCA1; loss of heterozygosity

Categories

Funding

  1. Russian Federation for Basic Research [11-04-00250, 10-04-92601, 10-04-00962]
  2. Federal Agency for Science and Innovations [02.740.11.0780]
  3. Commission of the European Communities [PITN-GA-2009-238132]
  4. Government of Moscow [15/11]
  5. Royal Society [JP090615]
  6. Sigrid Juselius
  7. Finnish Medical Foundations
  8. Cancer Research UK [11174] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The BLM gene belongs to the RecQ helicase family and has been implicated in the maintenance of genomic stability. Its homozygous germline inactivation causes Bloom syndrome, a severe genetic disorder characterized by growth retardation, impaired fertility and highly elevated cancer risk. We hypothesized that BLM is a candidate gene for breast cancer (BC) predisposition. Sequencing of its entire coding region in 95 genetically enriched Russian BC patients identified two heterozygous carriers of the c.1642 C>T (Q548X) mutation. The extended study revealed this allele in 17/1,498 (1.1%) BC cases vs. 2/1,093 (0.2%) healthy women (p = 0.004). There was a suggestion that BLM mutations were more common in patients reporting first-degree family history of BC (6/251 (2.4%) vs. 11/1,247 (0.9%), p = 0.05), early-onset cases (12/762 (1.6%) vs. 5/736 (0.7%), p = 0.14) and women with bilateral appearance of the disease (2/122 (1.6%) vs. 15/1376 (1.1%), p = 0.64). None of the BLM-associated BC exhibited somatic loss of heterozygosity at the BLM gene locus. This study demonstrates that BLM Q548X allele is recurrent in Slavic subjects and may be associated with BC risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available