4.7 Article

Human acute leukemia cells injected in NOD/LtSz-scid/IL-2Rγ null mice generate a faster and more efficient disease compared to other NOD/scid-related strains

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 123, Issue 9, Pages 2222-2227

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23772

Keywords

preclinical models; acute leukemia; circulating endothelial progenitors

Categories

Funding

  1. sixth EU Framework Programme [504743]
  2. AIRC (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro)
  3. ISS (Istituto Superiore di Sanita)
  4. NIH [CA34196]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transplantation of human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) primary cells and cell lines in different strains of immunodeficient mice has led to preclinical models extensively used to investigate acute leukemia stem cells, biology and drug sensitivity. We studied the engraftment kinetics of AML and ALL id cell likes and primary cells in 3 strains of NOD.CB17-Prkdc(scid) (NOD/scid, NS)-related mice (NOD.Cg-Prkdc(scid)B2m(tm1Unc)/J, abbreviated NOD/scid/beta 2 null, NSB; and NOD. Cg-Prkdc(scid)Il2 rg(tm1Wjll)/SzJ, abbreviated NOD/scid/IL-2R gamma null, NSG). The engraftment of human malignant cells was investigated by means of clinicopathological criteria, How cytometry, PCR and immunobistochemistrv. In NSG mice, we observed a significantly faster development of leukemia-related symptoms and a higher percentage of leukemia cells in the blood, in the marrow and in the spleen. The leukemia-related angiogenic switch (measured as the number of circulating endothelial cells and progenitors) was faster in NSG compared to NS and NSB mice. These models will be instrumental to studies on leukemia-initiating stein cells, leukemia biology, preclinical treatment studies, and to obtain patient-specific preclinical models to design and investigate patient-tailored therapies. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available