4.0 Article

Simple Nonparametric Confidence Regions for the Evaluation of Continuous-Scale Diagnostic Tests

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1256

Keywords

empirical likelihood; likelihood ratios; ROC curve; sensitivity; specificity

Funding

  1. University of Padova [075919]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evaluation of the ability of a diagnostic test to separate diseased subjects from non-diseased subjects is a crucial issue in modern medicine. The accuracy of a continuous-scale test at a chosen cut-off level can be measured by its sensitivity and specificity, i.e. by the probabilities that the test correctly identifies the diseased and non-diseased subjects, respectively. In practice, sensitivity and specificity of the test are unknown. Moreover, which cut-off level to use is also generally unknown in that no preliminary indications driving its choice could be available. In this paper, we address the problem of making joint inference on pairs of quantities defining accuracy of a diagnostic test, in particular, when one of the two quantities is the cut-off level. We propose a technique based on an empirical likelihood statistic that allows, within a unified framework, to build bivariate confidence regions for the pair (sensitivity, cut-off level) at a fixed value of specificity as well as for the pair (specificity, cut-off level) at a fixed value of sensitivity or the pair (sensitivity, specificity) at a fixed cut-off value. A simulation study is carried out to assess the finite-sample accuracy of the method. Moreover, we apply the method to two real examples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available