4.7 Article

A study of neuroprotective and antioxidant activities of heteropolysaccharides from six Sargassum species

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.031

Keywords

Neuroprotective activity; Antioxidant activity; Sargassum

Funding

  1. Ocean Public Welfare Scientific Research Project [201005024-201405040]
  2. CAS-Guangdong Provincial Joint Project [20128090400028]
  3. Doctorial Fund of Shandong Province [BS2011YY066]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Shandong Province [2011GHY11529]
  5. Science and Technology program of applied basic research projects of Qingdao Municipal [12-1-4-8-(3)-jch]
  6. Prospective Joint Research Projects of Jiangsu Province [BY2011189]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heteropolysaccharides were extracted from Sargassum integerrimum (S.I), Sargassum maclurei (S.M), Sargassum naozhouense (S.N), Spiraea thunbergii (S.T), Sargassum hemiphyllum (S.H) and Sargassum fusiforme (S.F), and their neuroprotective effects and antioxidant activities were investigated. It showed that S.I, S.N, S.T and S.F exhibited neuroprotective activities, whereas S.H and S.M did not. For this reason, they were separated by anion-exchange chromatography. It was apparent that the fraction 2 represented the principal difference between the active and non-active compounds. However, it did not correlate with neuroprotective effect. In addition, the results on antioxidant activities showed that the hydroxyl-radical scavenging effect contribute to the neuroprotective effect of S.T and S.N, and the DPPH-radical scavenging effect and reducing power contribute to S.T, S.F and S.I. However, the superoxide-radical scavenging effect did not correlate with neuroprotective activity. The conclusion was that the neuroprotective activity of the family of compounds investigated depended on a variety of factors. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available