4.7 Article

Biodegradable films produced from the bacterial polysaccharide FucoPol

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.022

Keywords

Bacterial exopolysaccharide; Films characterization; Barrier properties

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2013, PTDC/AGR-ALI/114706/2009]
  2. FCT [SFRH/BD/79101/2011, SFRH/BPD/87774/2012, SFRH/BPD/72280/2010]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/79101/2011, PTDC/AGR-ALI/114706/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

FucoPol, an exopolysaccharide produced by Enterobacter A47, grown in bioreactor with glycerol as carbon source, was used with citric acid to obtain biodegradable films by casting. The films were characterized in terms of optical, hygroscopic, mechanical and barrier properties. These films have shown to be transparent, but with a brown tone, imparting small colour changes when applied over coloured surfaces. They were hydrophilic, with high permeability to water vapour (1.01 x 10(-11) mol/m s Pa), but presented good barrier properties to oxygen and carbon dioxide (0.7 x 10(-16) mol m/m(2) s Pa and 42.7 x 10(-16) mol m/m(2) s Pa, respectively). Furthermore, films have shown mechanical properties under tensile tests characteristic of ductile films with high elongation at break, low tension at break and low elastic modulus. Although the obtained results are promising, films properties can be improved, namely by testing alternative plasticizers, crosslinking agents and blends with other biopolymers. Taking into account the observed ductile mechanical properties, good barrier properties to gases when low water content is used and their hydrophilic character, it is foreseen a good potential for FucoPol films to be incorporated as inner layer of a multilayer packaging material. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available