4.7 Article

Donepezil nanosuspension intended for nose to brain targeting: In vitro and in vivo safety evaluation

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.022

Keywords

Cholinesterase inhibitor; Intranasal delivery; Ionic crosslinking; Nanosuspension; Alzheimer's disease

Funding

  1. Indian Council of Medical Sciences (ICMR) [45/26/2007-PHA/BMS]
  2. Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (INMAS)
  3. DRDO [INM/TS/IEC/007/07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study was to develop donepezil loaded nanosuspension for direct olfactory administration which reaches the brain and determining safety profile in Sprague-Dawley rats. Nanosuspension was prepared by ionic-crosslinking method. The developed nanosuspension was intranasally instilled into the nostrils of rats with the help of cannula (size 18/20) so that drug reached into the brain directly via nose to brain pathway. The nanosuspension had an average size of 150-200 nm with a polydispersity index of 0.341. The donepezil concentration was estimated in the brain homogenate using HPLC method. The C. showed concentration of donepezil in brain and plasma as 7.2 +/- 0.86 and 82.8 +/- 5.42 ng/ml, respectively, for drug suspension and concentration of donepezil in brain and plasma as 147.54 +/- 25.08 and 183.451 +/- 13.45 ng/ml, respectively, for nanosuspension at same dose of 0.5 mg/ml when administered intranasally (p<0.05). The in vivo safety evaluation studies showed that no mortality, hematological changes, body weight variations and toxicity in animals was observed, when nanosuspension was administered in different doses as compared to control group (normal saline). Donepezil loaded chitosan nanosuspension is a potential new delivery system for treatment of Alzheimer's disease, when transported via olfactory nasal pathway to the brain. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available