4.5 Article

BIFURCATIONS OF NORMALLY HYPERBOLIC INVARIANT MANIFOLDS IN ANALYTICALLY TRACTABLE MODELS AND CONSEQUENCES FOR REACTION DYNAMICS

Journal

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218127413300437

Keywords

Normally hyperbolic invariant manifold; bifurcation; phase space dividing surface; reaction dynamics; transition state theory

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-01-1-0769]
  2. Leverhulme Trust
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-1223754]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K000489/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/K000489/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K000489/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Chemistry [1223754] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we study the breakdown of normal hyperbolicity and its consequences for reaction dynamics; in particular, the dividing surface, the flux through the dividing surface (DS), and the gap time distribution. Our approach is to study these questions using simple, two degree-of-freedom Hamiltonian models where calculations for the different geometrical and dynamical quantities can be carried out exactly. For our examples, we show that resonances within the normally hyperbolic invariant manifold may, or may not, lead to a loss of normal hyperbolicity. Moreover, we show that the onset of such resonances results in a change in topology of the dividing surface, but does not affect our ability to define a DS. The flux through the DS varies continuously with energy, even as the energy is varied in such a way that normal hyperbolicity is lost. For our examples, the gap time distributions exhibit singularities at energies corresponding to the existence of homoclinic orbits in the DS, but these singularities are not associated with loss of normal hyperbolicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available