4.3 Article

Validation of the THI-12 questionnaire for international use in assessing tinnitus: A multi-centre, prospective, observational study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 671-677

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.653448

Keywords

Tinnitus; tinnitus handicap inventory; THI-12; TBF-12; validation; inter-cultural validity

Funding

  1. Merz Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate and confirm the reliability and validity of the tinnitus handicap inventory12 (THI-12) in various countries and languages. Design: Prospective, observational study conducted in seven countries, using linguistically harmonized versions of the THI-12 in six languages. These were evaluated for test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, known-groups validity, and construct validity. Basic psychometric properties of supporting instruments were compared. Questionnaires were completed by the subjects at baseline and again after 12-30 days. Study sample: Adults with a clinical diagnosis of subjective tinnitus. Results: An exploratory factor analysis of the THI-12 items for the U. S. study population at baseline revealed a single common factor of high eigenvalue. Confirmatory factor analysis supported this in the separate countries. Test-retest reliability was moderate to high, and the conclusions were supported by a known-groups analysis; correlations with other scales expected to support construct validity were moderate. Conclusions: The THI-12 total score showed acceptable psychometric properties for all countries tested. The relationships between the THI-12 and the one-month and one-week versions of the TRS and TSS were similar and convergent. The THI-12 is thus a promising diagnostic tool for assessing treatment effects in multi-cultural and multi-lingual trials on tinnitus therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available