4.3 Article

Open ear hearing aids in tinnitus therapy: An efficacy comparison with sound generators

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 8, Pages 548-553

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.572263

Keywords

Tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT); Custom sound generators (SG); Open ear hearing aids (OE-HA)

Funding

  1. Tinnitus Research Initiative
  2. Fondazione Ascolta e Vivi
  3. GN ReSound A/S

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) with sound generators or with open ear hearing aids in the rehabilitation of tinnitus for a group of subjects who, according to Jastreboff categories, can be treated with both approaches to sound therapy (borderline of Category 1 and 2). Design: This study was a prospective data collection with a parallel-group design which entailed that each subject was randomly assigned to one of the two treatments group: half of the subjects were fitted binaurally with sound generators, and the other half with open ear hearing aids. Both groups received the same educational counselling sessions. Study sample: Ninety-one subjects passed the screening criteria and were enrolled into the study. Structured interviews, with a variety of measures evaluated through the use of visual-analog scales and the tinnitus handicap inventory self-administered questionnaire, were performed before the therapy and at 3, 6, and 12 months during the therapy. Results: Data showed a highly significant improvement in both tinnitus treatments starting from the first three months and up to one year of therapy, with a progressive and statistically significant decrease in the disability every three months. Conclusions: TRT was equally effective with sound generator or open ear hearing aids: they gave basically identical, statistically indistinguishable results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available