4.7 Article

A revised surface resistance parameterisation for estimating latent heat flux from remotely sensed data

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2011.10.011

Keywords

Latent heat flux; Landsat TM and ETM; Surface resistance

Categories

Funding

  1. CAS Action Plan for West Development Project Watershed Airborne Telemetry Experimental Research (WATER) [KZCX2-XB2-09-03]
  2. Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-EW-312]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40875006]
  4. Chinese State Key Basic Research Project [2009CB421305]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estimating evapotranspiration (ET) is required for many environmental studies. Remote sensing provides the ability to spatially map latent heat flux. Many studies have developed approaches to derive spatially distributed surface energy fluxes from various satellite sensors with the help of field observations. In this study, remote-sensing-based lambda E mapping was conducted using a Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) image and an Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) image. The remotely sensed data and field observations employed in this study were obtained from Watershed Allied Telemetry Experimental Research (WATER). A biophysics-based surface resistance model was revised to account for water stress and temperature constraints. The precision of the results was validated using 'ground truth' data obtained by eddy covariance (EC) system. Scale effects play an important role, especially for parameter optimisation and validation of the latent heat flux (lambda E). After considering the footprint of EC, the lambda E derived from the remote sensing data was comparable to the EC measured value during the satellite's passage. The results showed that the revised surface resistance parameterisation scheme was useful for estimating the latent heat flux over cropland in arid regions. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available