4.7 Article

Daily cost of antimicrobial therapy in patients with Intensive Care Unit-acquired, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 161-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.10.015

Keywords

bloodstream infection; cost; pharmacoeconomics; Intensive Care Unit; antimicrobial therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analysed daily antimicrobial costs of Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-acquired, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (BSI) per patient admitted to the ICU of a university hospital, based on prospectively collected data over a 4-year period (2003-2006). Costs were calculated based on the price of the agent(s) initiated on the first day of appropriate treatment and according to: (i) focus of infection; (ii) pathogen; and (iii) antimicrobial agent. The study included 310 adult patients who developed 446 BSI episodes. Mean overall daily antimicrobial cost was (sic) 114.25. Daily antimicrobial cost was most expensive for BSIs with unknown focus ((sic) 137.70), followed by catheter-related ((sic) 122.73), pulmonary ((sic) 112.80), abdominal ((sic) 98.00), wound ((sic) 89.21), urinary ((sic) 87.85) and other inciting focuses ((sic) 81.59). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most prevalent pathogens isolated. Treatment of BSIs caused by Candida spp. was the most costly. The daily antimicrobial costs per infected patient with multidrug-resistant BSI was ca. 50% higher compared with those without ((sic) 165.09 vs. (sic) 82.67; P < 0.001). Among the total of 852 prescriptions, beta-lactant antibiotics accounted for approximately one-third of the overall daily cost of antimicrobial agents. The antibiotic cost associated with ICU-acquired, laboratory-confirmed BSI is significant and should be reduced by implementing infection control measures and preventive strategies. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available