3.9 Article

Maternal smoking in pregnancy and reproductive hormones in adult sons

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 565-572

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2007.00807.x

Keywords

follow-up study; hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis; long-term effects; pre-natal exposure; reproductive hormones; smoking

Categories

Funding

  1. Health Insurance Foundation [2004B137, 2005B081, 2006B107]
  2. Danish Medical Research Council [22-03-0200, 22-04-0271, 271-05-0760]
  3. Augustinus Foundation [052620]
  4. Knud Hojgaard Foundation [37.065]
  5. Fulbright commission
  6. Simon Fougner Hartmanns Family Foundation
  7. Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation
  8. University of Aarhus Research Foundation
  9. Biomedical Laboratory Scientist Education and Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Smoking during pregnancy has been reported to alter levels of reproductive hormones in adult sons. From a Danish pregnancy cohort established in 1984 1987, 347 out of 5109 sons were selected according to their exposure to tobacco smoke in foetal life. From February 2005 to January 2006, a blood sample from each young man (18-21 years) was collected and analysed for reproductive hormones. There were no apparent trends of increasing or decreasing hormonal levels with increased exposure to maternal tobacco smoking during pregnancy. Only the free testosterone/free estradiol ratios increased with increased maternal smoking during pregnancy (p for trend = 0.05). No trends for increasing odds ratios for high follicle-stimulating hormone (25 percentile) or low inhibin B (<= 25 percentile) in relation to maternal smoking were observed. We found no major indication of long-term effects of pre-natal exposure to tobacco smoke on the levels of reproductive hormones later in life, but the data may suggest a shift in the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis towards higher androgenicity. This result was, however, of only borderline significance and could be because of chance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available