4.6 Article

Experimental evaluation of surface topographies of NMQL grinding ZrO2 ceramics combining multiangle ultrasonic vibration

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2718-y

Keywords

Zirconia ceramics; Surface grinding; 2D ultrasonic vibration; Nanofluid; Minimum quantity lubrication

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575290]
  2. Major Research Project of Shandong Province [2017G GX30135, 2018GGX103044]
  3. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2017PEE002, ZR2017PEE011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication (NMQL) technique has many technological and economic advantages in grinding operation. NMQL can improve grinding performance in terms of cooling and lubrication and is ecofriendly because it consumes a small amount of grinding fluid. Ultrasonic machining can improve grinding performance owing to its reciprocating vibration mechanism and furrow widening. Consequently, the simultaneous utilization of these techniques is anticipated to improve the surface quality, especially for hard brittle materials. In this research, multiangle two-dimensional (2D) ultrasonic vibration is utilized in zirconia ceramic grinding. Results reveal that the adhesion and material peeling phenomenon on the workpiece surface is obviously reduced compared with dry grinding without ultrasonic vibration. The synergistic effect of multiangle 2D ultrasonic and NMQL is also studied. With increased angle, the roughness value is found to initially increase (from 45 degrees to 90 degrees) and then decreases (from 90 degrees to 135 degrees). Moreover, the lubricating effect under 90 degrees is the poorest, with the highest Ra and RSm values of 0.703m and 0.106mm, respectively; conversely, the minimum Ra value (0.585m) is obtained under 45 degrees, and the lowest RSm value (0.076mm) is obtained under 135 degrees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available