4.0 Article

EVIDENCE OF CO-SPECIFICITY BETWEEN TETRANYCHUS EVANSI AND TETRANYCHUS TAKAFUJII (ACARI: PROSTIGMATA, TETRANYCHIDAE): COMMENTS ON TAXONOMIC AND AGRICULTURAL ASPECTS

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACAROLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 485-501

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01647950903431156

Keywords

Acari; systematics; Tetranychidae; new synonym; reproductive compatibility; genetic distance; morphology

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19380032]
  2. Project for Agricultural Technology in the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan [18057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a combination of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (COI) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence information, cross-breeding, and morphological criteria, the taxonomic status of Tetranychus takafujii was reassessed. Described from Japan and very close to Tetranychus evansi, only the male empodium II separated the two species. Six T. evansi samples collected in Brazil, France, Kenya, Spain (including the Canary Islands), Taiwan, and two samples from Japan previously species-identified as T. takafujii, were examined. DNA sequences consistently divide the samples into two groups: group I held the mites from Brazil and France and group II contained the remaining samples of T. evansi together with the two mites collected in Japan. Likewise, cross-breeding experiments detected the same two groups that were reproductively partially incompatible. However, the Japanese samples were completely compatible with the rest of the group II T. evansi samples. The empodium II shape failed to distinguish consistently between the T. evansi and T. takafujii samples, but rather highlighted its variability, questioning its utility for separating these taxa. Congruent results support the co-specificity of the two taxa. It is concluded that T. takafuji is a junior synonym of T. evansi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available