4.5 Review

The ecology of tick-borne diseases

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 12-13, Pages 1059-1077

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.009

Keywords

Tick-borne disease; Global change; Tick; Host; Environment; Anthropogenic influence

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of the Environment, Climate Protection and the Energy Sector Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zoonotic diseases are major causes of infection related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Of the various arthropods capable of transmitting pathogens that cause such diseases to humans, ticks, which are vectors of more kinds of pathogens than any other group of invertebrate, have become an increasing focus of attention. This is particularly the case in the temperate northern hemisphere where they are a significant vector of human disease. Here, we provide an overview of the complex ecological systems defining the various epidemiological cycles of tick-borne diseases. We highlight the abiotic and biotic factors influencing the establishment and persistence of tick populations and their associated pathogens. Furthermore, we emphasize the dynamic nature of such systems, especially when they are under the influence of both small and large-scale anthropogenic changes to the environment. Although a great deal of work has been done on ticks and the diseases which they transmit, the very dynamism of the system means that new factors are continually arising which shift the epidemiological pattern within specific areas. We therefore consider that more detailed, long-term (i.e. at least 10 years), multidisciplinary studies need to be carried out to define why and how these pattern shifts take place and to determine their. public health significance. (C) 2013 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available