4.5 Article

The progression of the intra-erythrocytic cell cycle of Plasmodium falciparum and the role of the centriolar plaques in asynchronous mitotic division during schizogony

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 71-80

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.07.012

Keywords

Plasmodium falciparum; Mitosis; Centriolar plaques; FISH

Categories

Funding

  1. Niels Bohr Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cell division cycle and mitosis of intra-erythrocytic (IE) Plasmodium falciparum are poorly understood aspects of parasite development which affect malaria molecular pathogenesis. Specifically, the timing of the multiple gap (G), DNA synthesis (S) and chromosome separation (M) phases of parasite mitosis are not well defined, nor whether genome divisions are immediately followed by cleavage of the nuclear envelope. Curiously, daughter merozoite numbers do not follow the geometric expansion expected from equal numbers of binary divisions, an outcome difficult to explain using the standard model of cell cycle regulation. Using controlled synchronisation techniques, confocal microscopy to visualise key organelles and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to follow the movements and replication of genes and telomeres, we have re-analysed the timing and progression of mitotic events. The asynchronous duplications of the P. falciparum centrosome equivalents, the centriolar plaques, are established and these are correlated with chromosome and nuclear divisions in a new model of P. falciparum schizogony. Our results improve the resolution of the cell cycle and its phases during P. falciparum IE development, showing that asynchronous, independent nuclear division occurs during schizogony, with the centriolar plaques playing a major role in regulating mitotic progression. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Australian Society for Parasitology Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available