4.5 Article

Proposal for a new tapeworm order, Rhinebothriidea

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 497-511

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.09.002

Keywords

Cestoda; New order; Rhinebothriidea; Rhinebothriinae; Tetraphyllidea; Batoids; Elasmobranchs; ssrDNA; lsrDNA; Phylogeny; Stalked bothridia

Categories

Funding

  1. Systematics Research Fund
  2. NSF PEET [DEB 0118882]
  3. NSF BS I [0542846, 0542941]
  4. Wellcome Trust [043965]
  5. NERC [NER/A/S/2003/00313]
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/A/S/2003/00313] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Division Of Environmental Biology [GRANTS:13952957] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [0818696] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The polyphyletic nature of the tapeworm order Tetraphyllidea Carus, 1863 is addressed in part with the establishment of the new order Rhinebothriidea for a subset of the taxa formerly comprising the phyllobothriid subfamily Rhinebothriinae (Platyhelminthes: Eucestoda). Support for the order comes from Bayesian, maximum likelihood, and parsimony analyses of complete ssrDNA and partial (D1-D3) lsrDNA sequence data for 58 cestode species. These data consisted of novel data generated for 40 species in 15 genera of candidate rhinebothriines and the cathetocephalidean species Sanguilevator yearsleyi as well as comparable data taken from GenBank for an additional 18 cestode species in 17 genera. In total, the species analyzed consisted of two Catherocephalidea, two Litobothriidea, two Lecanicephalidea, three Proteocephalidea, and 49 Tetraphyllidea. The tetraphyllideans consisted of three Onchobothriidae, three Serendipidae, and 43 Phyllobothriidae (one Thysanocephalinae, one Echeneibothriinae, five Phyllobothriinae, 35 candidate Rhinebothriinae and the poorly known Spongiobothrium). This work suggests that some elements of current membership in the group are in need of revision. For example, while inclusion of the echeneibothriine genus Echeneibothrium and the phyllobothriine genera Rhodobothrium and Anthocephalum, and also Spongiobothrium, in the Rhinebothriidea is supported, inclusion of Duplicibothtium and Caulobothrium in the new order is not. Histological sections and scanning electron microscopy of selected members of the study group suggest that the presence of bothridial stalks may serve as an effective morphological feature to characterise the order. The group is restricted to elasmobranchs, and appears to hive a particular affinity for Myliobatiformes. The new order includes at least 13 genera. Intraordinal relationships were determined to be insufficiently stable to justify the formal reorganization of rhinebothriidean families at this time. (C) 2008 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available