4.6 Article

Mesh-independent matrix cracking and delamination modeling in laminated composites

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nme.3195

Keywords

composite; mesh independent cracking; delamination; failure

Funding

  1. NASA AAD-2 [NNX08AB05A-G]
  2. AFRL [FA8650-05-D-5052]
  3. University of Dayton Research Institute
  4. NASA [103402, NNX08AB05A] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The initiation and evolution of transverse matrix cracks and delaminations are predicted within a mesh-independent cracking (MIC) framework. MIC is a regularized extended finite element method (x-FEM) that allows the insertion of cracks in directions that are independent of the mesh orientation. The Heaviside step function that is typically used to introduce a displacement discontinuity across a crack surface is replaced by a continuous function approximated by using the original displacement shape functions. Such regularization allows the preservation of the Gaussian integration schema regardless of the enrichment required to model cracking in an arbitrary direction. The interaction between plies is anchored on the integration point distribution, which remains constant through the entire simulation. Initiation and propagation of delaminations between plies as well as intra-ply MIC opening is implemented by using a mixed-mode cohesive formulation in a fully three-dimensional model that includes residual thermal stresses. The validity of the proposed methodology was tested against a variety of problems ranging from simple evolution of delamination from existing transverse cracks to strength predictions of complex laminates without a priori knowledge of damage location or initiation. Good agreement with conventional numerical solutions and/or experimental data was observed in all the problems considered. Published 2011. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available