4.6 Article

Coupled HM analysis using zero-thickness interface elements with double nodes. Part I: Theoretical model

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nag.735

Keywords

geomechanics; reservoir engineering; discontinuities; discrete crack; zero-thickness interface; HM coupling; consolidation; hydraulic fracture

Funding

  1. AGAUR-DURSI
  2. ETSECCPB
  3. UPC
  4. MEC [MAT2005-24522, BIA2006-12717]
  5. MFOM [80015/A04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, the authors have proposed a new double-node zero-thickness interface element for diffusion analysis via the finite element method (FEM) (Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 2004; 28(9): 947-962). In the present paper, that formulation is combined with an existing mechanical formulation in order to obtain a fully coupled hydro-mechanical (or HM) model applicable to fractured/fracturing,geomaterials. Each element (continuum or interface) is formulated in terms of the displacements (it) and the fluid pressure (p) at the nodes. After assembly, a particular expression of the traditional 'u-p' system of coupled equations is obtained, which is highly non-linear due to the strong dependence between the permeability and the aperture of discontinuities. The formulation is valid for both pre-existing and developing discontinuities by using the appropriate constitutive model that relates effective stresses to relative displacements in the interface. The system of coupled equations is solved following two different numerical approaches: staggered and fully coupled. In the latter, the Newton-Raphson method is used, and it is shown that the Jacobian matrix becomes non-symmetric due to the dependence of the discontinuity permeability on the aperture. In the part It companion paper (hit. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 2008; DOI: 10.1002/nag.730), the formulation proposed is verified and illustrated with some application examples. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available