4.7 Article

Challenges in cryopreservation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) for clinical therapeutic applications

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 371-375

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2013.02.001

Keywords

T regulatory cells; Cellular therapy; Clinical application; Cryopreservation; cGMP

Funding

  1. Illinois Department of Public Health Pancreatic Islet Transplantation
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [NN402 353038, NR13-0126-10/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Promising results of initial studies applying ex-vivo expanded regulatory T cell (Treg) as a clinical intervention have increased interest in this type of the cellular therapy and several new clinical trials involving Tregs are currently on the way. Methods of isolation and expansion of Tregs have been studied and optimized to the extent that such therapy is feasible, and allows obtaining sufficient numbers of Tregs in the laboratory following Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines. Nevertheless, Treg therapy could even more rapidly evolve if Tregs could be efficiently cryopreserved and stored for future infusion or expansions rather than utilization of only freshly isolated and expanded cells as it is preferred now. Currently, our knowledge regarding the impact of cryopreservation on Treg recovery, viability, and functionality is still limited. Based on experience with cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), cryopreservation may have a detrimental effect on Tregs, can decrease Treg viability, cause abnormal cytokine secretion, and compromise expression of surface markers essential for proper Treg function and processing. Therefore, optimal strategies and conditions for Treg cryopreservation in conjunction with cell culture, expansion, and processing for clinical application still need to be investigated and defined. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available