4.7 Article

Evaluation of the immunosuppressive activity of artesunate in vitro and in vivo

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 306-312

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2013.03.011

Keywords

Immunosuppression; Artesunate; Tregs; Foxp3; TGF-beta

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [201104796]
  2. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission [11JCYBJC14600]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) for Young Scientists Fund [81202843]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artemisinin and its derivatives have been reported to have immunosuppressive activity in some laboratory studies. However, the detail of mechanism remains to be demonstrated. The objective of this study is to clarify the immunosuppressive activity of artesunate (AST), one kind of artemisinin derivatives, and to find its unexplored mode of action. In vitro, the proliferation of T lymphocytes and its cytotoxicity were measured by WST-1 and MTT assay. In vivo, the immunomodulatory effect of AST was evaluated in a mouse model of delayed type hypersensitivity reaction (DTH), which was based on a T cell-mediated immune response. The data displayed that AST had a relatively high immunosuppressive activity with low toxicity, and could inhibit T lymphocyte proliferation induced by mitogen and alloantigen. Meanwhile, topical administration of AST could suppress DTH response significantly. Moreover, AST could also increase the secretion of TFG-beta, coupling with the striking enhance of NF-kappa B/p65 and Smad2/3 signaling. The promotion of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) was shown to be a possible mechanism involved in AST-mediated regulation. Taken together, these observations exhibit the potential of developing AST as a novel safe remedy for the treatment of T cell-mediated immune disorders. Crown Copyright (c) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available