4.7 Article

Impact of tacrolimus on bone metabolism after kidney transplantation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 69-72

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2012.03.019

Keywords

Kidney transplantation; Bone disorder; Tacrolimus

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-81072443, NSFC-81001325, NSFC 30950010]
  2. Science and Technology Bureau of Sichuan Province [2006Z09-037]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [20090181110026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone disease is a common clinical problem after kidney transplantation. To date, studies investigating the effects of tacrolimus (TAC) on bone metabolism in vivo or vitro yielded conflicting data. This study was carried out to discuss the relationship between TAC blood concentrations and bone metabolism status in kidney transplant recipients. 72 kidney recipients whose time since transplantation more than 5 months (551 months) were divided into two groups by the TAC blood concentrations, high TAC group (TAC >= 6 ng/mL) and low TAC group(TAC<6 ng/mL), respectively. Bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar vertebrae L1-L4 and neck of the femur and allied biochemical markers (TRAP-5b, B-ALP, 25-(OH)D, PTH, beta-CrossLaps. N-MID Osteocalcin, Ca, PO4) were measured simultaneously. Our results showed that 27.78% of our patients had bone loss and the loss rates were statistical different between the high TAC group and low TAC group in kidney recipients (45.5% vs 20.0%, P = 0.026). Correlation analysis showed that TAC concentrations were positively correlated with tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRAP-5b) in male recipients (r = 0.287, P<0.05). In conclusion, kidney transplant recipients with high TAC blood concentrations are at risk of bone loss, and TAC may cause bone disorders involved in accelerated bone resorption. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available