4.7 Article

CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells induced by TGF-β, IL-2 and all-trans retinoic acid attenuate obliterative bronchiolitis in rat trachea transplantation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages 1887-1894

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.07.020

Keywords

Obliterative bronchiolitis; Tracheal transplantation; Tregs; Th17; Foxp3

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30872557, 81070073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) is the major obstacle for long-term allograft survival in lung transplantation, and the underlying mechanism is still not well understood. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been shown to be essential in the maintenance of immune tolerance. In this study we investigated the role of Tregs in protecting OB in rat. We show that the combination of TGF-beta, Interleukin (IL)-2, and all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) could induce naive rat CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells to differentiate into CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cells in vitro, and they acquired suppressive function. In a rat orthotopic tracheal transplantation OB model, the adoptive transfer of the induced Tregs reduced symptoms of airway obliteration and fibrication of grafts when compared with adoptive transfer of control cells without suppressive property. Moreover, recipients treated with the induced Tregs secreted high level of immunosuppressive cytokine TGF-beta and IL-10, and low level of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-17, IFN-gamma, IL-6, and MCP-1, and had fewer effector T cells including Th17 cells and Th1 cells in the graft. Taken together, these findings suggest that in vitro induced Tregs by the combination of TGF-beta, IL-2, and atRA are effective in protecting rat trachea allograft rejection through the inhibition of effector T cells and their function. These datas implicate new therapies to prevent OB and allograft rejection in human lung transplantation. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available