4.5 Article

Both mutated and unmutated memory B cells accumulate mutations in the course of the secondary response and develop a new antibody repertoire optimally adapted to the secondary stimulus

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 683-695

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxt030

Keywords

Antibody repertoire; memory B cells; secondary response; somatic hypermutation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [AI064752]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23380073] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-affinity memory B cells are preferentially selected during secondary responses and rapidly differentiate into antibody-producing cells. However, it remains unknown whether only high-affinity, mutated memory B cells simply expand to dominate the secondary response or if in fact memory B cells with a diverse V-H repertoire, including those with no mutations, accumulate somatic mutations to create a new repertoire through the process of affinity maturation. In this report, we took a new approach to address this question by analyzing the V-H gene repertoire of IgG1(+) memory B cells before and after antigen re-exposure in a host unable to generate IgG(+) B cells. We show here that both mutated and unmutated IgG1(+) memory B cells respond to secondary challenge and expand while accumulating somatic mutations in their V-H genes in a stepwise manner. Both types of memory cells subsequently established a V-H gene repertoire dominated by two major clonotypes, which are distinct from the original repertoire before antigen re-exposure. In addition, heavily mutated memory B cells were excluded from the secondary repertoire. Thus, both mutated and unmutated IgG1(+) memory cells equally contribute to establish a new antibody repertoire through a dynamic process of mutation and selection, becoming optimally adapted to the recall challenge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available