4.5 Article

Quantitative PET reporter gene imaging of CD8+ T cells specific for a melanoma-expressed self-antigen

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 155-165

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxn133

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Dana Foundation
  2. Merck Research Laboratories
  3. Fred Eiserling and Judith Lengyel Graduate Doctorate Fellowship
  4. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-06ER64249]
  5. National Cancer Institute [R24CA92865]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adoptive transfer (AT) T-cell therapy provides significant clinical benefits in patients with advanced melanoma. However, approaches to non-invasively visualize the persistence of transferred T cells are lacking. We examined whether positron emission tomography (PET) can monitor the distribution of self-antigen-specific T cells engineered to express an herpes simplex virus 1 thymidine kinase (sr39tk) PET reporter gene. Micro-PET imaging using the sr39tk-specific substrate 9-[4-[F-18]fluoro-3-(hydroxymethyl)-butyl]guanine ([F-18]FHBG) enabled the detection of transplanted T cells in secondary lymphoid organs of recipient mice over a 3-week period. Tumor responses could be predicted as early as 3 days following AT when a > 25-fold increase of micro-PET signal in the spleen and 2-fold increase in lymph nodes (LNs) were observed in mice receiving combined immunotherapy versus control mice. The lower limit of detection was similar to 7 x 10(5) T cells in the spleen and 1 x 10(4) T cells in LNs. Quantification of transplanted T cells in the tumor was hampered by the sr39tk-independent trapping of [F-18]FHBG within the tumor architecture. These data support the feasibility of using PET to visualize the expansion, homing and persistence of transferred T cells. PET may have significant clinical utility by providing the means to quantify anti-tumor T cells throughout the body and provide early correlates for treatment efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available