4.5 Article

Correlation of effector function with phenotype and cell division after in vitro differentiation of naive MART-1-specific CD8(+) T cells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 53-62

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxn123

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [SAF03/05184, SAF06/03687]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Health [FIS PI061320]
  3. Junta de Extremadura, Spain [03/2, 3PR05A012]
  4. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)
  5. Outcome and Impact of Specific Treatment in European Research on Melanoma [QLRT-2001-00668]
  6. 5th Framework Program of the European Union [QLK6-CT2002-02283]
  7. 6th FP European Network [503306]
  8. AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program
  9. NIAID
  10. NIH
  11. Maurice Gately, Hoffmann-La Roche Inc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adoptive transfer of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells may represent an effective strategy for immunotherapy of tumors such as melanoma, but is limited by the number and functionality of in vitro expanded T cells. Here, we document that although ELAGIGILTV-specific CD8(+) T cells from different donors initially possessed a naive phenotype, after antigen-induced in vitro expansion two distinct phenotypes correlating with cell proliferation rate emerged in the different donors. Those cultures achieving fewer cumulative population doublings (CPDs) were cytotoxic and displayed a CD45RA(+)CCR7(-) phenotype. In contrast, cultures reaching higher CPDs were non-cytotoxic T cells with a CD45RA(-)CCR7(-) phenotype. Thus, the generation of larger numbers of ELAGIGILTV-specific CD8(+) T cells correlates negatively with the acquisition of a CD45RA(+)CCR7(-) phenotype and cytotoxic capacity. A better understanding of the differentiation pathways of cytotoxic T cells to obtain optimally efficient cells for adoptive transfer will allow the development of new immunotherapy protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available