4.2 Article

Long-Term Prognostic Impact After Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Acute Heart Failure Evaluation of the RIFLE Criteria

Journal

INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 313-319

Publisher

INT HEART JOURNAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1536/ihj.53.313

Keywords

Acute decompensated heart failure; Worsening renal function; Mortality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between the short-term prognosis of acute heart failure (AHF) and acute kidney injury (AKI) using the risk, injury, failure, and end stage (RIFLE) criteria has already been reported, however, the relationship between the long-term prognosis and AKI has not. We investigated the relationship between the long-term prognosis after discharge and AKI using the RIFLE criteria. Five hundred patients with AHF admitted to our intensive care unit were analyzed. Patients were assigned to a no AKI (n = 156), Class R (risk; n = 201), Class I (injury; n = 73), or Class F (failure; n = 70) using the most severe RIFLE classifications during hospitalization. We evaluated the relationships between the RIFLE classifications and any-cause death, and HF events including death and readmission for I-IF within I year. A multivariate logistic regression model found that Class I (P = 0.013, OR: 2.768; 95% CI: 1.236-6.199) and Class F (P < 0.001, OR: 7.920; 95% CI: 3.497-17.938) were independently associated with any-cause death, and Class F was associated with HF events (P = 0.001, OR: 3.486; 95% CI: 1.669-7.281). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed the prognosis, including death, to be significantly poorer in Class I than in no AKI and Class R, to be significantly poorer in Class F than in no AM, Class R, and Class I, and the prognosis including HF events to be significantly poorer in Class F than in no AKI, Class R, and Class I. The presence of severe AKI (Class I and F) was independently associated with long-term mortality for AHF. (lilt Heart J 2012; 53: 313-319)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available