4.5 Article

Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in a Turkish subpopulation: a retrospective study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
Volume 46, Issue 11, Pages 1032-1038

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iej.12094

Keywords

canal configuration; cone-beam computed tomography; C-shaped canal; mandibular second molars

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to evaluate the prevalence and anatomical features of C-shaped canals in permanent mandibular second molars amongst members of a Turkish population. MethodologyAn endodontist and oral radiologist examined CBCT images of 271 Turkish mandibular second molars to determine the presence of C-shaped canals and their anatomical features. Root canal configurations at five different levels were categorized using the classification of Fan etal. (Journal of Endodontics, 30, 2004a,b, 899-903; 904-8). Bilateral or unilateral occurrence of C-shaped canals and their relationships with gender, age and tooth position were examined and statistically analysed using the chi-squared test. ResultsOf the 271 mandibular second molars examined, 24 (8.9%) molars from 17 patients had a C-shaped root canal system. The prevalence of bilateral C-shaped canals was 6.3% amongst 111 patients with bilateral mandibular second molars. There were no significant differences in the distribution of C-shaped canals with respect to gender or age. Only one tooth had the same canal configuration from the orifice to the apex. In the remainder of the teeth, the cross-sectional canal configuration changed at different levels of the root. ConclusionsThe configuration of C-shaped canals varied along the length of the root. The prevalence of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in this Turkish population was lower than in other Asian populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available