4.5 Article

Mechanical properties of nickel-titanium rotary instruments produced with a new manufacturing technique

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 337-341

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01835.x

Keywords

cyclic fatigue; endodontic instruments; flexibility; nickel-titanium; thermal treatment

Funding

  1. SybronEndo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Aim To investigate whether flexibility and cyclic fatigue resistance was increased for nickel-titanium instruments produced by a new manufacturing technique. Methodology Forty K3 tip size 25, 0.06 taper (SybronEndo) nickel-titanium rotary instruments were randomly selected and divided into two groups (n = 20). One group served as control, being the commercially available instruments produced with a traditional grinding process (K3). The second group of instruments (K4 prototypes) were then subjected to a proprietary thermal treatment after the grinding process. Finally, each group was randomly divided into two subgroups of 10 instruments each, to perform the stiffness test and the cyclic fatigue test. All data were recorded and subjected to statistical evaluation using Student's t-test. Significance was set at the 95% confidence level. Results For the stiffness test, a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was noted between K3 and K4 prototype instruments. K4 prototype instruments were significantly more flexible when compared to K3 instruments (59.3 +/- 4.3 vs. 98.1 +/- 6.4 g cm-1). For the cyclic fatigue test, a significant difference (P < 0.05) was noted between K3 and K4 prototype instruments. K4 prototype instruments demonstrated a significant increase in the mean number of cycles to failure (NCF) when compared to K3 instruments (1198 +/- 279 vs. 542 +/- 81 NCF). Conclusions The new manufacturing technique resulted in the K4 prototype instruments having enhanced mechanical properties, compared to K3 instruments, manufactured with a traditional grinding process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available