4.6 Article

Improved adsorption of cadmium ions from aqueous solution using chemically modified apple pomace: Mechanism, kinetics, and thermodynamics

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.10.028

Keywords

Adsorption; Isotherm; Thermodynamics; Kinetics; Equilibrium

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India [131338/2k11/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apple pomace (AP), before and after chemical modification (CM), was assessed for the removal of cadmium (Cd2+) ions from aqueous solution by equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics studies. The chemical modification of AP was done with succinic anhydride by a simple ring opening mechanism for providing a large surface area for cadmium adsorption. The surface area of chemically modified apple pomace (CMAP) increased about 18% after the treatment. The amount of CMAP required for cadmium removal was 50 times less than the unmodified AP. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation was found to be more suitable for the AP and CMAP adsorption experimental data with a correlation coefficient of r(2) = 0.99 than was the Freundlich isotherm. The FTIR spectra of CMAP, with or without cadmium loading, indicated that ester (-C00), carboxyl (-CO), and amine (-NH2) groups were involved in the cadmium adsorption mechanism. The adsorption of cadmium ions onto AP and CMAP followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. The Delta G degrees value, at different temperatures, was calculated by applying the Van't Hoff equation and found to be negative, indicating that the reaction is spontaneous in nature. The value of, Delta H degrees indicated that the adsorption was exothermic (-6.93 KJ mol(-1)) and endothermic (3.171 KJ mol(-1)) for AP and CMAP, respectively. CMAP could be reutilized for up to three cycles with a removal efficiency of 76.6%, while AP efficiency lessened significantly after a single cycle. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available